Real life test for a major film. On small screens C300 looks sharper. We haven’t seen a print yet. C300 at ISO 3200 and 6400 is GREAT! No grain. At least nothing that the normal person can see. And I would say that many experts could be fooled. It seems that Alexa has more capacity to seen in the high lights. Also pushing 2 stops up in Proress in not a problem. Doing that with C300 under exposed WAS A Problem. Nevertheless by shooting at 3200 ISO, made it look great.
1 view
6
2
4 months ago 00:04:03 2
“Pop Goes the Music“ Raquel (1991) Music Video
8 months ago 00:19:15 1
Arri Alexa 65 vs. Alexa Mini - Large Format Look Test (s35mm / 65mm)
11 months ago 00:03:19 1
How To Calculate: The Number Needed to Treat (NNT)
12 months ago 00:16:58 1
The film look, with a film camera.
1 year ago 00:06:12 1
Smallrig VCT-14 Shoulder Pad Review & Comparison to C200 Baseplate (4K)
1 year ago 00:00:41 8
ARRI SR1 16mm Footage
1 year ago 00:00:55 1
Comparing Arri Alexa and Canon C300
1 year ago 00:01:45 1
Camera Comparison – Arri Alexa, Panasonic EVA1, RED Dragon, Canon C300 m-II, BM Ursa Mini, Sony FS5
1 year ago 00:13:22 1
What’s The Best Top Handle for Your Camera Rig?
2 years ago 00:03:30 10
ZEISS CP.2 50mm T1.5 at T2.0
2 years ago 00:11:10 4
Blackmagic Pocket 4k VS Hollywood Movie Camera | Red Dragon
3 years ago 00:03:33 60
Original BMPCC vs. GH5, A7RIII, RED Epic, ARRI Alexa Mini
3 years ago 00:08:11 69
Sony FX3 and Canon C70 vs Arri Alexa Mini LF
4 years ago 00:04:49 48
BMPCC6K vs Blackmagic Ursa Mini Pro 12K - Camera comparison