10mm Armor Plate vs 160mm Concrete ft. tungsten carbide penetrator | Armor Penetration Simulation
Simulation comparing the effectiveness of concrete armor and spaced armor vs sub-caliber shell with a tungsten carbide core.
Pzgr 40 APCR (36mm, tungsten carbide core, steel body) at 840 m/s
VS
10mm 350BHN RHA 150mm air 162mm medium hardness cast armor at 25° (5° side angle, -0.5° fall angle)
Weight of armor covering the upper frontal plate:
160mm Concrete ~1000kg
10mm steel ~ 230kg
1 view
8
3
2 months ago 00:12:07 1
なんだこれ!?初立体化のスティールヘイズに困惑!【30MMガンプラレビュー】STEEL HAZE review【ARMORED CORE VI FIRES OF RUBICON】
2 months ago 00:13:11 2
どこが簡素だよ!?ナイトフォールが細かすぎてヤバい!【30MMガンプラレビュー】NIGHTFALL review【ARMORED CORE VI FIRES OF RUBICON】
7 months ago 00:01:12 1
What if the Strv 103 had ERA? | 125mm 3BM9 APFSDS vs S-Tank with ERA | Armour Penetration Simulation
7 months ago 00:13:19 1
How to Make EVA Foam Look Like Leather Fallout 4 Heavy Shoulder Armor