120 mm M829A2 APFSDS-T penetration against Leopard 2A5 tank Turret composite armor

This video presents 120 mm M829A2 APFSDS-T penetration against Leopard 2A5 tank Turret composite armor. This video is updation of part-1 with few improvement in composite armor. It is found that, the projectile is successfully able to penetrate the front turret plates as well as whole composite armor (NERA) plates. The video highlights various penetration angle. The assumption are mentioned at the beginning of the video. The Leopard 2A5 turret armor and projectile is simplified for the analysis. The APFSDS-T fins and ballistic cap is ignored in the simulation. Please subscribe to our channel: Music Credits: Other Similar Videos: 120 mm M829A2 APFSDS-T Vs Leopard 2 Turret # Armor Piercing Simulation Part-1 1. 125mm BM15 APFSDS Projectile Vs 250 BHN RHA #Armor Piercing Simulation 2. Bullet Penetration Vs Aluminum Plate #Failed Armor Penetration mm KE M829A2 APFSDS Vs T44 Tank Armor Inclined Plate 4. NATO x 51mm Bullet Penetration on Aluminum Plate # Finite Element Analysis , Failed Penetration2 NATO X 50 mm Bullet Vs Armor Steel Plate # Armor Penetration Simulation 6. BM15 APFSDS Vs 250 BHN RHA #Armor Piercing Simulation , fixed 90 mm T33 Vs Reinforced Concrete and Steel Bars # Armor Piercing Ammunition mm NATO Vs Bulletproof Steel Vest #Armor Piercing Simulation mm M829 APFSDS Vs 125 mm BM 15 APFSDS # APFSDS Collision # Armor Piercing Simulation. Quality Armor Vs Reinforced Concrete and Steel Bars # Armor Piercing simulation 11. Pz Kpfw V (Panther) Tank Vs Shot, A.P., 90mm, T33 # Armor Penetration simulation mm 3BM9 APFSDS-T Vs Leopard 2 # Armor Penetration Simulation 13. 3VBM3/3BM9 APFSDS Vs M829 APFSDS #APFSDS Collision 14. APFSDS Vs NERA #Non Explosive Reactive Armor 15. 125 mm 3BM9 APFSDS-T Vs Leopard 2 # Armor Penetration Simulation 16. 105 mm APFSDS-T M900 Vs Leopard 2 # Ballistic Simulation 17. 120 mm K276 APFSDS-T Vs Armour Plate #Ballistic Simulation